______________________________________________ DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 4, 1995 _______________________________________________ GSBCA 13356-P-R, 13390-P-R WILLIAMS ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Protester, and HSQ TECHNOLOGY, Protester/Intervenor, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent, and SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS, Intervenor. Raymond Fioravanti and Michael K. Love of Epstein Becker & Green, Washington, DC; and Alan Dickson of Epstein Becker & Green, Los Angeles, CA, counsel for Protester Williams Electric Company, Inc. Donald O. Pratt and Paul H. Sanderford of Canterbury, Stuber, Pratt, Elder & Gooch, Dallas, TX, counsel for Protester/Intervenor HSQ Technology. Craig R. Schmauder and Richard C. Frank, Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC; and Steven W. Feldman and Charles T. Frew, Army Engineer Division, Huntsville, AL, counsel for Respondent. Timothy F. Brown and Shelly L. Ewald of Watt, Tieder & Hoffar, McLean, VA, counsel for Intervenor Siebe Environmental Controls. PARKER, Board Judge. ORDER Williams Electric Company, Inc. and HSQ Technology filed motions for reconsideration on November 29 and November 30, 1995, respectively. On December 1, the parties moved to withdraw their motions. Accordingly, protesters' motions for reconsideration are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Rule 28(a). ________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER Board Judge