GSBCA 13320-P DISMISSED:  July 25, 1995
                                                          
 
 
                    GSBCA 13315-P, 13320-P, 13324-P
 
 
                       TELOS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION,
                    A DIVISION OF TELOS CORPORATION,
 
                                  and
 
                   SYSOREX INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
 
                                  and
 
                INTERNATIONAL DATA PRODUCTS CORPORATION,
 
                                           Protesters/Intervenors,
 
                                   v.
 
           ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS,
 
                                           Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                       DUNN COMPUTER CORPORATION,
 
                                           Intervenor.
 
        Timothy  Sullivan, Katherine S. Nucci, and Martin R. Fischer
   of   Dykema   Gossett   PLLC,   Washington,   DC,   counsel   for
   Protester/Intervenor  Telos  Systems  Integration,  A Divison  of
   Telos Corporation.
 
        Thomas  C. Papson  and J.  Keith  Burt of  McKenna &  Cuneo,
   Washington,   DC,   counsel  for   Protester/Intervenor   Sysorex
   Information Systems, Inc.
 
        Maria  F.  Glinsmann of  Glinsmann  & Glinsmann,  Chartered,
   Gaithersburg, MD, counsel  for Protester/Intervenor International
   Data Products Corporation.
 
        Dinah  Stevens,  Roberta  M.  Echard,  and  Linda  Horowitz,
   Administrative Office  of the United  States Courts,  Washington,
   DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
        Edward J. Tolchin of Fettman & Tolchin, Fairfax, VA, counsel
   for Intervenor Dunn Computer Corporation.
 
   BORWICK, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On  June  29,  1995,   Sysorex  Information  Systems,   Inc.
   (Sysorex), filed  a protest  against the award  of a  contract to
   Dunn Computer  Corporation by  the Administrative  Office of  the
   United States Courts.  The  procurement at issue seeks to acquire
   automatic  data  processing  hardware  and  software  to  operate
   primarily in a  networked office environment.   Sysorex's protest
   consists  of eight  counts as  follows: 1)  respondent  failed to
   eliminate  Dunn's proposal  for noncompliance  with  the minimum,
   mandatory  requirements   of  the  solicitation;   2)  respondent
   improperly evaluated Dunn's proposals; 3) respondent's best value
   analysis  was  based  on inaccurate  and  flawed  evaluations; 4)
   respondent  improperly  accepted   Dunn's  unbalanced  offer;  5)
   respondent  improperly  accepted  Dunn's   offer  despite  Dunn's
   incorrect  certifications;  6)  Dunn's  offer failed  to  satisfy
   minimum   mandatory   requirements    concerning   user-installed
   components; 7) respondent's best value analysis was fundamentally
   flawed and respondent  failed to conduct a  meaningful integrated
   analysis  of the evaluation  of technical, price,  and management
   factors; and  8) respondent  violated statute  and regulation  by
   conducting  post-BAFO  discussions  with  Dunn.    Dunn  Computer
   Corporation is an intervenor of right in Sysorex's protest.
 
        On  June 26, Telos Systems Integration,  a Division of Telos
   Corporation,  filed its own protest against the same procurement,
   and  on July  3, 1995,  International  Data Products  Corporation
   filed its own protest against the same procurement.  All protests
   are consolidated.  All protesters are intervenors of right in the
   other protests.   Dunn  Computer Corporation  also intervened  in
   each protest as an intervenor of right.
 
        The Board convened a prehearing conference and established a
   schedule for further  proceedings and set a date  for the hearing
   on the merits  of these consolidated protests.  On July 20, 1995,
   protester  Sysorex filed  a motion  to dismiss  its  protest with
   prejudice.    Neither the  other  protesters/intervenors  nor the
   respondent has any  objection to Sysorex's motion.   Accordingly,
   pursuant to Rule 28(a), Sysorex's protest is DISMISSED.
 
 
 
                                 ______________________
                                 ANTHONY S. BORWICK
                                 Board Judge