______________________ GRANTED: July 20, 1995 ______________________ GSBCA 13305-C(13261-P) DIMENSIONS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Applicant, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent. Cyrus E. Phillips, IV, and Christopher M. Johnson of Kilcullen, Wilson and Kilcullen, Washington, DC, counsel for Applicant. Craig E. Hodge and LTC Ronald K. Heuer, U.S. Army Materiel Command, Alexandria, VA; and David H. Scott, U.S. Army Test & Evaluation Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), VERGILIO, and GOODMAN. VERGILIO, Board Judge. On June 14, 1995, Dimensions International, Incorporated filed this application to recover its costs of filing and pursuing the protest granted by the Board, Dimensions International, Inc. v. Department of the Army, GSBCA 13261-P, 1995 BPD 100 (May 16, 1995). Dimensions seeks to recover $8,522.66--which represents its costs of retained counsel (attorney fees and disbursements). The Board concludes that Dimensions prevailed in the underlying protest and is an appropriate party to recover its costs. The Board grants the request for $8,522.66. Findings of Fact 1. The Board granted the protest underlying this application; the agency recognized that the protester's proposal was capable of being made acceptable and reinstated the protester in the competitive range. Dimensions. 2. On June 14, 1995, pursuant to statute, 40 U.S.C. 759(f)(5)(C) (1988), Dimensions filed its application to recover $8,522.66, as its costs of filing and pursuing the protest. 3. Of the requested amount, $8,484.50 represents fees of retained counsel; that is, for each of two attorneys, an hourly rate multiplied by a total number of hours expended by the individual attorney. The daily entries of effort attribute the given hours to the underlying protest. Motion for Award of Costs, Enclosure B. The time expended and hourly rates are reasonable. 4. Of the requested amount, $38.16 is for disbursements, for a taxicab ride to the Board, photocopying, and postage. Each element of this amount is reasonable and attributable to filing and pursuing the protest. Discussion The applicant prevailed as the protester in the underlying protest; it was reinstated in the competitive range. It is appropriate for the protester to recover its costs of filing and pursuing the protest. The requested amounts were incurred in filing and pursuing the underlying protest. The amounts are reasonable and reimbursable. The Board grants the recovery of these costs. Decision The Board GRANTS the applicant's request for recovery of $8,522.66. The awarded amount is to be paid in accordance with statute. 40 U.S.C. 759(f)(5)(C) (1988); 31 U.S.C. 1304 (1988). ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge We concur: ____________________________ ____________________________ STEPHEN M. DANIELS ALLAN H. GOODMAN Board Judge Board Judge