DISMISSED:  April 10, 1995
                                                       
 
 
                             GSBCA 13228-P
 
 
                UNITED INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING, INC.,
 
                                                Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
 
                                                Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                            EER CORPORATION,
 
                                                Intervenor.
 
        J. Patrick McMahon  and Thomas K. David of  McMahon & David,
   Vienna, VA, counsel for Protester.
 
        Vera Meza, Lt.  Col. Ronald Heuer, and Rita  Eady, Office of
   Counsel,  Army  Materiel  Command, Alexandria,  VA,  counsel  for
   Respondent.
 
        Paralee  White, William  F.  Savarino,  Laurel  Hockey,  and
   G. Brent Conner  of Cohen  & White,  Washington, DC,  counsel for
   Intervenor.
 
   GOODMAN, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        United  International  Engineering,  Inc.  (UIE) filed  this
   protest against the Department of the Army, Army Materiel Command
   on  March  29,  1995.   The  procurement  at  issue  is  a  small
   disadvantaged business competitive  procurement which is  seeking
   Battlefield Automation  Systems  Engineering  Support.    UIE  is
   protesting  the award of  the contract to  EER Corporation, which
   has intervened as  an intervenor-of-right.  UIE contends that the
   contract award to EER Corporation is not reasonable and is not in
   compliance with  the evaluation  criteria contained  in the  RFP,
   thereby violating statute and regulation.
 
        On April 6, 1995, UIE filed a motion to withdraw its protest
   alleging that the  subject procurement  may be  exempt under  the
   Warner  Amendment, 10  U.S.C.    2315  (1988),  from  Brooks  Act
   jurisdiction,  40   U.S.C.    759(a)  (1988).     Respondent  and
   intervenor have no  objection to the  dismissal of this  protest.
   Accordingly, this protest is DISMISSED.  Rule 28(a).  The Board's
   order suspending respondent's delegation of procurement authority
   hereby lapses.
 
 
 
                                      ________________________
                                      ALLAN H. GOODMAN
                                      Board Judge