DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: January 11, 1995 GSBCA 13130-P DAKOTA SERVICES, INC., Protester, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent. Lyle Moe, Grand Forks, ND, counsel for Protester. Clarence D. Long, III, Office of General Counsel, Department of the Air Force, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman). ORDER On December 27, 1994, Dakota Services, Inc., filed this protest against the award by the Department of the Air Force of a contract for the provision of fire protection services. Upon receipt of the complaint, the Board issued an order noting that its protest jurisdiction is limited to procurements for automatic data processing equipment (ADPE), suggesting that the subject of this procurement does not appear to be ADPE, and directing protester to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. At a telephonic conference held on January 4, 1995, protester's counsel responded by stating that he had intended to file the protest with the General Accounting Office, rather than the Board, and withdrawing the protest. He said that protester has no objection to a dismissal of the case and agreed to confirm this position in a letter to us. Notwithstanding subsequent oral promises by counsel to provide such a letter, no filing has been made. In these circumstances, the Board DISMISSES THE PROTEST WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with the dismissal to be converted to one with prejudice on January 18, 1995, unless a motion to reinstate the case is filed prior to that date. _________________________ STEPHEN M. DANIELS Board Judge