______________________
        
                         GRANTED:  May 12, 1995
                         ______________________
 
 
                         GSBCA 13094-C(13003-P)
 
 
                         HSQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
        Donald  O. Pratt  and  Paul  H.  Sanderford  of  Canterbury,
   Stuber, Pratt, Elder & Gooch, Dallas, TX, counsel for Protester.
 
        Craig R. Schmauder and Scott M. McCaleb, Office of the Chief
   Counsel, U.S.  Army Corps of  Engineers, Department of  the Army,
   Washington,  DC; Larry  E. Beall,  Office  of Counsel,  U.S. Army
   Corps  of Engineers, Department of  the Army, Mobile, AL, counsel
   for Respondent.
 
   Before Board Judges PARKER, DEVINE, and DeGRAFF.
 
   DeGRAFF, Board Judge.
 
        On October  5, 1994, HSQ  Technology, Inc. (HSQ)  filed this
   protest concerning the award made by the United States Army Corps
   of  Engineers pursuant  to solicitation DACA01-94-R-0127  for the
   installation  of  a utility  control  system  at the  Irwin  Army
   Community Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas.  On November 3, 1994, the
   parties  filed a Stipulation  and Agreement settling  the protest
   and  requesting that  the  protest be  dismissed.   The  parties'
   stipulation  states   that  there  were   improprieties  in   the
   evaluation  process,  that  the Army  agreed  to  take corrective
   action,  and that  HSQ was  a prevailing  interested party.   The
   Board dismissed the protest on November 3, 1994.  
 
        On December 1, 1994, HSQ  filed an application for the award
   of attorney fees, costs, and  consultant's fees that it  incurred
   in pursuing this protest.  On January  17, 1995, the Board issued
   a decision awarding  $26,500 to HSQ for attorney  fees and costs,
   as agreed upon by the parties.  The Board and the  parties agreed
   to  address  the application  for  consultant's fees  in  a later
   decision.
 
 
        On April 19, 1995, HSQ  filed an amended application for the
   award  of attorney  fees and  consultant's fees.   HSQ  submitted
   appropriate documentation justifying these fees.  On May 8, 1995,
   the parties  stipulated that  $6,880  is a  reasonable amount  of
   attorney fees and consultant's fees.  
 
                                Decision
 
        Pursuant  to 40 U.S.C.   759(f)(5)(C) (1988), HSQ is awarded
   $6,880 for  the  attorney  fees and  consultant's  fees  that  it
   incurred  in pursuing this  protest.  This  award is  to be paid,
   without interest, from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31
   U.S.C.   1304 (1988).
 
 
 
                                 ______________________________
                                 MARTHA H. DeGRAFF
                                 Board Judge
 
   We concur:
   ____________________________  _______________________________
   ROBERT W. PARKER              DONALD W. DEVINE
   Board Judge                   Board Judge