DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: December 13, 1994 GSBCA 13091-P AC TECHNOLOGY, INC., Protester, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent. Arthur J. Sands, Jr., Executive Vice President of AC Technology, Inc., McLean, VA, appearing for Protester. Clarence D. Long, III, Office of the General Counsel, Department of the Air Force, Arlington, VA, counsel for Respondent. GOODMAN, Board Judge. ORDER This protest was filed on November 30, 1994, by AC Technology, Inc., against the Department of the Air Force. The procurement in question is for the acquisition of memory modules to be used in the Combat Air Force Workstation employed in the Air Operations Centers. Protester contends that the awardee, Dataram Corporation, does not meet the requirements of the solicitation. On December 8, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that this contract is subject to the Warner Amendment, 10 U.S.C. 2315 (1982), recodified in the Brooks Act, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 759(a)(3)(C) (Supp. V 1988). On December 9, upon "realizing the critical nature of the project," protester withdrew its protest and asked for a dismissal without prejudice. Respondent concurs with protester's request. Accordingly, this protest is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This dismissal shall convert to one with prejudice ten working days from the date of this order unless protester moves to reinstate the protest prior to the expiration of the ten-day period. Rule 28(b). ________________________ ALLAN H. GOODMAN Board Judge