___________________________________________________
 
             DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  December 1, 1994
          ___________________________________________________
 
 
 
                             GSBCA 13085-P 
 
 
                     COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION,
 
                                                Protester,
 
                                  and
 
                           CTA INCORPORATED,
 
                                                Intervenor,
 
                                   v.
 
                    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
                                                Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                 OGDEN GOVERNMENT SERVICES CORPORATION,
 
                                                Intervenor.
 
        David S.  Cohen and  William F. Savarino  of Cohen  & White,
   Washington, DC; and  Helaine G. Elderkin and  Harvey N. Bernstein
   of Computer Sciences  Corporation, Falls Church, VA,  counsel for
   Protester.
 
        Michael  J.  Ladino  of  CTA  Incorporated,  Rockville,  MD,
   counsel for Intervenor CTA Incorporated.
 
        George  Barclay, Pamela J. Reiner, and Seth Binstock, Office
   of General Counsel, General Services Administration,  Washington,
   DC; and  Thomas Y. Hawkins,  Office of Regional  Counsel, General
   Services   Administration,   San  Francisco,   CA,   counsel  for
   Respondent.
 
        Carl J. Peckinpaugh,  Eric J. Marcotte, and Blaise A. Scinto
   of Winston & Strawn, Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor Ogden
   Government Services Corporation.
 
   NEILL, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        This  protest was  filed  by Computer  Sciences  Corporation
   (CSC), on November 21, 1994.  It concerns the award of a contract
   for automatic data  processing equipment by the  General Services
   Administration.    Ogden  Government  Services  Corporation,  the
   awardee in this  procurement, has intervened  in this protest  on
   the   side  of  respondent.    CTA  Incorporated  (CTA),  another
   participant  in the procurement, has also entered this proceeding
   as an intervenor of right.  
 
        On November  29, 1994,  through counsel,  protester filed  a
   motion to dismiss  this protest without prejudice.   CTA does not
   oppose the dismissal.
 
        Accordingly, this  protest is  DISMISSED WITHOUT  PREJUDICE.
   Rule 28(b).   In the event no motion to reinstate this protest is
   filed  within  thirty  days  of  the date  of  this  order,  this
   dismissal  shall  be  deemed  to  be   with  prejudice  upon  the
   expiration of that thirty day period.
 
 
                                      ___________________________
                                      EDWIN B. NEILL
                                      Board Judge