__________________________
 
                       GRANTED:  January 12, 1995
                       __________________________
 
 
                         GSBCA 13083-C(13003-P)
 
 
                    WILLIAMS ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.,
 
                                           Intervenor,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
        Raymond  Fioravanti  of   Epstein  Becker  &   Green,  P.C.,
   Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor Williams Electric Company,
   Inc.
 
        Craig R. Schmauder and Scott M. McCaleb, Office of the Chief
   Counsel, U.S. Army  Corps of Engineers,  Department of the  Army,
   Washington,  DC; Larry  E. Beall,  Office of  Counsel, U.S.  Army
   Corps of Engineers, Department of  the Army, Mobile, AL,  counsel
   for Respondent.
 
   Before Board Judges PARKER, DEVINE, and DeGRAFF.
 
   DeGRAFF, Board Judge.
 
        Pursuant   to  Rule  35,  Williams  Electric  Company,  Inc.
   (Williams)  filed  a timely  application  for  the award  of  the
   attorney fees and  costs that it incurred in  connection with its
   intervention in this protest.   The application is granted in the
   amount of $2,000.
 
        On October 5, 1994, HSQ Technology,  Inc. filed this protest
   concerning  the award  made by  the United  States Army  Corps of
   Engineers  pursuant  to  solicitation  DACA01-94-R-0127  for  the
   installation of  a  utility  control system  at  the  Irwin  Army
   Community Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas.  On November 3, 1994, the
   parties  filed a Stipulation  and Agreement settling  the protest
   and  requesting  that the  protest  be dismissed.    The parties'
   stipulation  states   that  there   were  improprieties   in  the
   evaluation  process,  that  the Army  agreed  to  take corrective
   action, and that Williams was a prevailing interested party.  The
   Board dismissed the protest on November 3, 1994.  
 
 
        On November 18,  1994, Williams filed an application for the
   award  of  $2,404  for  attorney   fees  and  $282.21  for  costs
   (telephone, telefax, postage,  photocopies, and courier) that  it
   incurred  in pursuing  this protest.    On January  6, 1995,  the
   parties stipulated that $2,000 is a reasonable amount of attorney
   fees  and costs.   Williams  submitted appropriate  documentation
   justifying  the  time expended  by  its attorneys  and  the costs
   incurred.  
 
                                Decision
 
        Pursuant to  40  U.S.C.   759(f)(5)(C)  (1988), Williams  is
   awarded $2,000 for  the attorney fees and costs  that it incurred
   in  pursuing this  protest.   This award  is to be  paid, without
   interest,  from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C.
     1304 (1988).
 
                                 ______________________________
                                 MARTHA H. DeGRAFF
                                 Board Judge
 
   We concur:
   ____________________________  _______________________________
   ROBERT W. PARKER              DONALD W. DEVINE
   Board Judge                   Board Judge