_____________________________________________
 
              DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 6, 1994
             _____________________________________________
 
    
                    GSBCA 12995-P, 13037-P, 13049-P
 
 
                     NCI INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
 
                                             Protester,
 
                                  and
 
                  DECISION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
 
                                           
                                  and
 
                AUTOMATED SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMMING, INC.,
 
                                             Protesters/Intervenors,
                                   v.
 
                      DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
 
                                             Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                       ADVANCED MANAGEMENT, INC.,
 
                                            Intervenor.
 
 
        J. Patrick McMahon, Vienna, VA, counsel for Protester.
 
        Robert M. Cambridge,  Arlington, VA, counsel for  Protester/
   Intervenor Decision Systems Technologies, Inc.
 
        Timothy Sullivan, Katherine  S. Nucci and Martin  R. Fischer
   of    Dykema    Gossett,     Washington,    DC,    counsel    for
   Protester/Intervenor Automated Systems and Programming, Inc.
 
        Thomas  E. Dougherty, Office  of Chief Counsel,  U.S. Secret
   Service,  Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel for
   Respondent.
 
        James  J. Regan  and  John  E. McCarthy,  Jr.  of Crowell  &
   Moring,   Washington,   DC,  counsel   for   Intervenor  Advanced
   Management, Inc.
 
    
   HYATT, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        These protests challenged the award by the Department of the
   Treasury, United States  Secret Service,  of a  contract for  the
   management of  its mainframe  facilities to  Advanced Management,
   Inc.  (AMI).  On December 1, 1994,  the parties to these protests
   submitted to  the Board  a joint settlement  agreement.   In this
   agreement, the Secret Service has  conceded and stipulated that a
   modification  to the contract  made some  seven days  after award
   violated  Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.606 and has agreed to
   undertake corrective  action.  The  settlement agreement  further
   provides  that the  parties  will jointly  move  to dismiss  with
   prejudice all three  protests, as amended, and  all interventions
   in the protests. 
 
        In  accordance  with  the  request  of  the  parties,  these
   protests, as amended, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
    
 
                                 __________________________
                                 CATHERINE B. HYATT
                                 Board Judge