___________________________________________________
 
               ORDER AMENDING DECISION: December 23, 1994
          ___________________________________________________
 
 
 
                            GSBCA 13020-P-R 
 
 
                  ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
 
                                                Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                         DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
 
                                                Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
 
                        RCG/HAGLER BAILLY, INC.,
 
                                                Intervenor.
 
        Daniel Parker and  William Lieth of Electronic  Data Systems
   Corporation, Herndon, VA, counsel for Protester.
 
        Betty  R. London  and  Stephanie  Levy,  Office  of  General
   Counsel, Western Area Power Administration, Department of Energy,
   Golden, CO, counsel for Respondent.
 
        Hugh  O'Neill,  Ellen F.  Randel, Donald  P. Young,  Judd L.
   Kessler, and  Ronald  S.  Perlman  of Porter,  Wright,  Morris  &
   Arthur, Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor.
 
 
   Before Board Judges NEILL, WILLIAMS, and GOODMAN.  
 
   NEILL, Board Judge.
 
        Protester has moved that  we amend our decision  of December
   19, 1994,  in  which we  granted count  one of  this protest  and
   dismissed  without  prejudice  the  remaining   counts.    Having
   reviewed  the  comments  filed   by  respondent  and   intervenor
   regarding the motion,  we grant the motion, in  part, by amending
   the decision to read: 
 
                                Decision
 
        Count I of this protest is GRANTED.  The remaining counts of
   the protest are  DISMISSED without prejudice.  The  Department of
   Energy  shall  give  EDS  and  all  other  participants  in  this
   procurement prompt  written notice  of any  decision it  makes to
   ratify either the procurement or the procurement and the contract
   award  which are  the subject  of  this protest.   The  dismissal
   ordered  herein shall  become  a  dismissal  with  prejudice  ten
   working  days from  the  date  of EDS'  receipt  of such  written
   notification,   unless  a  party   to  this  protest   moves  for
   reinstatement of the dismissed counts prior to the  expiration of
   this ten-day period.    
 
 
                                           _________________________
                                           EDWIN B. NEILL
                                           Board Judge
 
 
 
   We concur:
 
 
 
   __________________________
   MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS
   Board Judge
 
 
 
   ________________________
   ALLAN H. GOODMAN
   Board Judge