____________________________
        
                      DISMISSED:  November 3, 1994
                      ____________________________
 
 
                             GSBCA 13003-P
 
                         HSQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                  and
 
                    WILLIAMS ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.,
 
                                           Intervenor,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
 
                                           Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                        JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.,
 
                                           Intervenor.
 
        Donald  O. Pratt  and  Paul  H.  Sanderford  of  Canterbury,
   Stuber, Pratt, Elder & Gooch, Dallas, TX, counsel for Protester.
 
        Raymond  Fioravanti   of  Epstein  Becker  &   Green,  P.C.,
   Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor Williams Electric Company,
   Inc.
 
        Craig R. Schmauder and Scott M. McCaleb, Office of the Chief
   Counsel, U.S.  Army Corps of  Engineers, Department of  the Army,
   Washington,  DC; Larry  E. Beall,  Office of  Counsel, U.S.  Army
   Corps of Engineers, Department  of the Army, Mobile,  AL, counsel
   for Respondent.
 
        James P. Gallatin, Jr., of Popham Haik Schnobrich & Kaufman,
   Ltd.,  Washington, DC, counsel  for Intervenor  Johnson Controls,
   Inc.
 
   DeGRAFF, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On October 5, 1994, HSQ Technology, Inc., filed this protest
   concerning  the award  made by  the United  States Army  Corps of
   Engineers  pursuant  to  solicitation  DACA01-94-R-0127  for  the
   installation  of  a  Utility  Control System  at  the  Irwin Army
   Community Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas.
 
        On November  3, 1994,  the parties  filed a  Stipulation and
   Agreement settling the protest and requesting that the protest be
   dismissed.
 
        Accordingly,  this  protest is  DISMISSED.   Rule  28.   The
   suspension of  respondent's procurement  authority lapses by  its
   own terms.
 
 
                                 _________________________________
                                 MARTHA H. DeGRAFF
                                 Board Judge