_____________________________________________________
 
         MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED: September 20, 1994
         _____________________________________________________
 
 
                            GSBCA 12929-P-R
 
 
                    DAVID I. SHAPIRO AND ASSOCIATES,
 
                                        Protester, 
 
                                   v.
 
              UNITED STATES TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
 
                                        Respondent.
 
        David I. Shapiro of David I. Shapiro and Associates, McLean,
   VA, appearing for Protester.
 
        Calvin   D.  Trowbridge   III,  United   States  Trade   and
   Development Agency, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
   Before Board Judges BORWICK, VERGILIO, and GOODMAN.
 
   VERGILIO, Board Judge.
 
        The  Board dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the underlying
   protest.   David  I. Shapiro &  Assocs. v. United  States Trade &
   Development  Agency,  GSBCA  12929-P, 1994  BPD    173  (Aug. 24,
   1994).  On  August 29, 1994, the protester, David  I. Shapiro and
   Associates,  filed  a   request  for  the  Board   to  pursue  an
   examination of the  record developed in the case.   The protester
   says of the Board: "As Federal Officials you are entrusted by the
   public to ensure  that the procurement[s] made by  the government
   are  not only  in accordance  with the  FAR  [Federal Acquisition
   Regulation] and applicable legal statu[t]es, and are conducted in
   a manner that does not  cast doubt on the government[']s business
   ethics."
 
        Statute   sets  forth  the  scope  of  the  Board's  protest
   jurisdiction.    40  U.S.C.   759(f)  (1988).    Contrary to  the
   suggestions  of the  protester, having  concluded  that it  lacks
   jurisdiction, the Board is not in a position to reach  the merits
   of this protest.   The protester selected the  incorrect forum to
   pursue its protest.   The protester has  failed to raise  a basis
   meriting  reconsideration  or  further pursuit  of  the  protest.
   Rules 32, 33.  The Board DENIES the "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION."
 
                                        _________________________
                                        JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
 
                                        Board Judge
   We concur:
 
 
 
   __________________________           __________________________
   ANTHONY S. BORWICK                   ALLAN H. GOODMAN
   Board Judge                          Board Judge