_______________________________________________
 
                DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 11, 1994
            _______________________________________________
 
                             GSBCA 12821-P 
 
 
                    INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                      DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
        Shelton H.  Skolnick of  Skolnick &  Leishman, Derwood,  MD,
   counsel for Protester.
 
        Daniel  J. Mazella, Marc  I. Seldin, Ingrid  D. Falanga, and
   David  A. Ingold, Financial Management Service, Department of the
   Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
   VERGILIO, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On May  2, 1994, Integrated  Systems Group, Inc.  filed with
   the Board this  protest involving the respondent,  the Department
   of  the Treasury.    The  protester states  that  it submitted  a
   response to an agency notice of  intent to place an order against
   a  General   Services  Administration  federal   supply  schedule
   contract.    The protester  asserts that,  because the  notice of
   intent  did not  specify  a requirement  for  new equipment,  the
   agency  improperly restricted  competition  by  not pursuing  the
   used/refurbished  equipment  the  protester   identified  in  its
   response at a price below the noticed schedule price.
 
        On May 9, 1994, the protester filed a motion to dismiss with
   prejudice.  The  protester states that the agency  "has agreed to
   evaluate the  proposal [sic]  submitted by"  the protester.   The
   agency does not object to the dismissal.
 
        Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the protest.
   Rule 28(a).
 
                                   ___________________________
                                   JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
                                   Board Judge