DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 9, 1994 GSBCA 12732-P PINDAR DONNELLEY PARTNERSHIP, Protester, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Respondent, and INTERNATIONAL COMPUTAPRINT CORPORATION, Intervenor. Michael A. Nemeroff, Francis J. O'Toole, Gary P. Quigley, Joseph C. Port, Jr., and Denise W. DeFranco of Sidley & Austin, Washington, DC, counsel for Protester. Jerry A. Walz, Mark Langstein, Lisa Obayashi, and Fred Kopatich, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Finance and Litigation, Department of Commerce Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Joseph J. Petrillo, Laurel A. Heneghan, and Jessica C. Abrahams of Petrillo & Associates, Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor. WILLIAMS, Board Judge. ORDER On January 19, 1994, Pindar Donnelley Partnership (Pindar) protested the proposed award of a contract by the Department of Commerce (DOC), Patent and Trademark Office, to International ComputaPrint Corporation for the production of photocomposition tapes and data tapes under Request for Proposal number 52-PAPT-0-00027. On February 8, 1994, Pindar requested that the Board dismiss this protest with prejudice in accordance with a stipulation of settlement entered into by Pindar and DOC. Accordingly, this protest is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Rule 28(a).[foot #] 1 _____________________________ MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS Board Judge ----------- FOOTNOTE BEGINS --------- [foot #] 1 58 Fed. Reg. 69,263 (1993) (to be codified at 48 CFR 6101.28)