______________________________________________
 
             DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  October 20, 1993
             ______________________________________________
 
 
                             GSBCA 12592-P
 
 
                        UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC.,
 
                                             Protester,
 
                                  and
 
                    INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.,
 
 
                       DUNN COMPUTER CORPORATION,
 
 
                                  and
 
 
                              QSOFT, INC.,
 
                                           Intervenors,
 
                                   v.
 
                          DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
 
                                             Respondent.
 
        Eugene  D.  Rossel,  Vice  President  of  Marketing,  Unitek
   Technology Inc., Ontario, CA, appearing for Protester.
 
        Shelton H.  Skolnick, Judy D.  Leishman, and Amy M.  Hall of
   Skolnick   &  Leishman,  Derwood,   MD,  counsel  for  Intervenor
   Integrated Systems Group, Inc..
 
        Thomas  P. Dunn,  President  of  Dunn Computer  Corporation,
   Sterling, VA, appearing for Intervenor Dunn Computer Corporation.
 
        S. N.  Mohanty, President of  QSOFT, Inc., Dunn  Loring, VA,
   appearing for Intervenor QSOFT, Inc.
 
        Vaughn Hill and  Annaliese Impink, Office of  the Solicitor,
   Department of Labor, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
   HYATT, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On September 27,  1993, Unitek Technology Inc.  protested an
   award  by the  Department  of  Labor of  a  contract to  CompuAdd
   Corporation  for  the acquisition  of  automatic data  processing
   equipment (ADPE).   On October 18, 1993, the  Department of Labor
   and  Unitek,   along  with  intervening  parties,  Dunn  Computer
   Corporation and QSOFT, Inc., filed a joint stipulation requesting
   dismissal  of   the  protest   without  prejudice.     Intervenor
   Integrated Systems Group, Inc. has not joined in this motion.
 
        Accordingly, this  protest is  DISMISSED WITHOUT  PREJUDICE.
   The  dismissal shall convert to one  with prejudice within thirty
   days of the date of this order unless earlier reinstated.
 
                                 __________________________
                                 CATHERINE B. HYATT
                                 Board Judge