________________________________________
 
                DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 16, 1993
                ________________________________________
 
                             GSBCA 12457-P
 
                            NCR CORPORATION,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                      DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,
 
                                           Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                          SYSCON CORPORATION,
 
                                           Intervenor.
 
        Irwin  Goldbloom,  Thomas  L. Patten,  Jennifer  C.  Archie,
   Martin F.  Petraitis, and Edward J.  Shapiro of Latham & Watkins,
   Washington, DC;  and Jonathan  S. Hoak,  Steven W.  DeGeorge, and
   John Ackermann, Jr.,  of American Telephone &  Telegraph Company,
   Silver Spring, MD, counsel for Protester.
 
        Clarence D.  Long, III, and  Joseph M. Goldstein,  Office of
   the General Counsel, Department of the Air Force, Washington, DC,
   and  Greg M.  Weinman and  Corlyss M.  Drinkard, Office  of Chief
   Counsel, Internal  Revenue Service,  Washington, DC,  counsel for
   Respondent.
 
        Michael W. Clancy, Joseph K. Wiener, Vince S. Antonacci, and
   Mary Ita Snyder  of Pettit & Martin, Washington,  DC, counsel for
   Intervenor.
 
   DeGRAFF, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On July  14, 1993, the  Board ordered the dismissal  of this
   protest, without  prejudice.  In  accordance with the terms  of a
   settlement  agreement  entered  into by  the  parties,  our order
   provides that  the dismissal  will convert  to  a dismissal  with
   prejudice   after  respondent   terminates   its  contract   with
   intervenor and awards a contract to protester.  
 
 
        On  July  16,   1993,  protester  advised  the   Board  that
   respondent  terminated  intervenor's   contract  and  awarded   a
   contract to  protester.  Protester  requests that the  protest be
   withdrawn, with prejudice to refiling.  
 
        Accordingly,  the protest is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  Rule
   28(a).
 
                                 ___________________________________
                                 MARTHA H. DeGRAFF
                                 Board Judge