DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: April 20, 1993 GSBCA 12362-P R&S COMPUTERS & MEMORY ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, Protester, and UNITEK TECHNOLOGY, INC., Intervenor, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent, and INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC., Intervenor. Matthew Shafer, Managing Partner, R & S Computers & Memory Enhancement Products, appearing for Protester. Eugene D. Rossel, Vice President, Marketing, Unitek Technology, Inc., appearing for Intervenor Unitek Technology, Inc. Craig R. Schmauder and William Richards, Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Shelton H. Skolnick of Skolnick & Leishman, P.C., Vienna, VA, counsel for Intervenor, and Stephen L. Mills, Vice President, Marketing, Integrated Systems Group, Inc., appearing for Intervenor Integrated Systems Group, Inc. NEILL, Board Judge. ORDER This protest was filed with the Board on April 6, 1993, by R&S Computers & Memory Enhancement Products (R&S). R&S protested the award of a contract for certain automatic data processing equipment by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Integrated Systems Group, Inc. (ISG), a participant in the protested procurement, has intervened in this protest as an intervenor of right. Unitek Technology, Inc. (Unitek), also a participant in the procurement, has likewise intervened in this protest as an intervenor of right. On Friday, April 16, counsel for respondent filed with the Board copies of a signed stipulation. According to the terms of this stipulation, respondent, R&S, ISG, and Unitek have all agreed to the dismissal of this case in order to permit respondent to address it as an agency level protest under applicable agency procedures. The parties have further agreed that the protest may be reinstated at the Board within ten working days following any adverse decision on the agency protest, and that, if not so reinstated, this dismissal will convert to a dismissal "with prejudice." Accordingly, pursuant to the agreement of the parties and Rule 28(a), this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The dismissal will be deemed to be "with prejudice" if no party moves for a reinstatement of the protest within ten working days following any adverse decision on the agency protest. ____________________ EDWIN B. NEILL Board Judge