______________________________________________
 
               DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 31, 1993
            _______________________________________________
        
 
                             GSBCA 12339-P
 
                    INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
 
                                           Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                 GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.,
 
                                           Intervenor.
 
 
        Shelton H. Skolnick of Skolnick & Leishman, Derwood, MD, and
   S. Sam Bedi, Potomac, MD, counsel for Protester.
 
        Colonel Riggs L. Wilks, Jr.,  Major Charles R. Marvin,  Jr.,
   and  Major Karl  M. Ellcessor,  III,  Office of  the Chief  Trial
   Attorney,  Department of  the Army,  Arlington,  VA, counsel  for
   Respondent.
 
        Judith B.  Kassel of Government  Technology Services,  Inc.,
   Chantilly, VA, counsel for Intervenor.
 
   PARKER, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On March 19, 1993, the  Board docketed this protest filed by
   Integrated Systems Group, Inc. (ISG).  ISG alleged that the award
   of  a contract  for  automatic data  processing equipment  by the
   Department  of  the  Army  violated   statutes  and  regulations.
   Government  Technology  Services,  Inc.,   the  awardee  of   the
   contract, intervened as of right on March 25.
 
        On March 30, the Board received the parties' joint motion to
   dismiss the protest, which provided as follows:
 
             COMES  NOW  THE  PARTIES,  by  and  through  their
             attorneys, and  moves  this Board  to dismiss  the
             above-styled protest with prejudice.  The  parties
             have   reached   mutual   agreement  as   to   the
             appropriate disposition of the issues raised.
 
        Accordingly,   this  protest   is   hereby  DISMISSED   WITH
   PREJUDICE.   Rule 28(a).  The Board's  suspension of respondent's
   delegation of procurement authority lapses by its terms.
 
                                      ______________________________
                                      ROBERT W. PARKER
                                      Board Judge