______________________________________________
 
              DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 6, 1993   
             _____________________________________________
 
 
                             GSBCA 12337-P 
 
 
                  COASTAL COMPUTER CONSULTANTS CORP.,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                      DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
        Ned  W.   Livornese,  Colorado  Springs,  CO,   counsel  for
   Protester. 
        Frederick  G. Petrick,  Jr. and  Patricia Grady,  Litigation
   Division, Office of  the Comptroller of the  Currency, Department
   of the Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
   LaBELLA, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        This protest was filed by Coastal Computer Consultants Corp.
   (Coastal)  on March  18,  1993,  against  the Department  of  the
   Treasury.     Coastal  filed   its  protest  alleging   that  the
   Comptroller of the  Currency, Department of the  Treasury, failed
   properly to synopsize  its requirements in the  Commerce Business
   Daily and  made an award  to a higher priced  schedule contractor
   without issuing  a competitive  solicitation as  required by  the
   Federal Information  Resources Management  Regulations.   Coastal
   also complained that  the agency  improperly imposed  unnecessary
   and  unwarranted conditions upon Coastal without any intention of
   issuing a Request for Proposals.
 
        On March 22, 1993, the Board held a prehearing conference in
   this  matter,  in  which  the  Government  chose  not  to  oppose
   suspension of the procurement.  
 
        On  April 2,  1993, the  Board  received a  joint motion  to
   dismiss filed by  both parties.  The parties have stated that all
   disputes at issue  have been settled and have  requested that the
   Board dismiss the protest with prejudice.  
 
                                                                   2
 
 
        Accordingly,  the  parties'  joint  motion  to  dismiss   is
   granted.  This protest is  DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  The Board's
   order  of March 23,  1993, suspending respondent's  delegation of
   procurement authority, lapses by its own terms.
 
                                                                    
                                     VINCENT A. LaBELLA
                                     Board Judge