_______________________________________________
 
            DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  February 24, 1993
            _______________________________________________
 
                             GSBCA 12285-P
 
               EVERGREEN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
        Thomas  E. Chilcott of  Odin, Feldman &  Pittleman, Fairfax,
   VA, counsel for Protester.
 
        Michael Cunningham  and Diane-Marie  Carrero, Navy  Regional
   Contracting Center, Department of the Navy, Philadelphia, PA; and
   Jonathan Kosarin, Naval Supply  Systems Command, Washington,  DC,
   counsel for Respondent.
 
   DeGRAFF, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On February 3,  1993, the Board docketed a  protest filed by
   Evergreen Information Technologies,  Inc. (Evergreen).  Evergreen
   protested  several of  the  requirements  of solicitation  number
   NOO140-92-0450  as  being  unduly  restrictive  of   competition.
   Respondent,   Department  of   the   Navy   (Navy),  issued   the
   solicitation  on  July  20,  1992,  for  an  Electronic  Document
   Repository and Distribution System.  
 
        On February  23, 1993, we received a  stipulation, signed by
   counsel for  both parties,  which states  that  the parties  have
   agreed that the protest be  dismissed, without prejudice to being
   refiled, upon these conditions:   Navy will require  proposals to
   be  submitted on or  after March 12, 1993,  and Evergreen will be
   permitted to refile this protest no later than March 10, 1993.
 
        Accordingly,  the protest is  DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
   being refiled no later than March 10, 1993.  Rule 28(a)(1).  This
   shall become a dismissal with prejudice on March 11, 1993, unless
   prior  to that  date, Evergreen  requests a reinstatement  of its
   protest.  Rule 28(a)(2).   The suspension of Navy's delegation of
   procurement authority lapses by its own terms.
 
                                      _____________________________
                                      MARTHA H. DeGRAFF
                                      Board Judge