NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF OPINION
                UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER: December 1, 1993
                                                         
 
 
                         GSBCA 12667-P, 12670-P
 
 
                     PINDAR DONNELLEY PARTNERSHIP,
 
                                                Protester,
 
                                  and
 
                           GRAPHICDATA, INC.,
 
 
   Protester/Intervenor,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
 
                                                Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                INTERNATIONAL COMPUTAPRINT CORPORATION,
 
                                                Intervenor.
 
        Michael  A. Nemeroff, Francis  J. O'Toole, Gary  P. Quigley,
   Joseph C. Port,  Jr., and Denise W. DeFranco of  Sidley & Austin,
   Washington,  DC,   counsel   for   Protester   Pindar   Donnelley
   Partnership.
 
        Richard  D. Lieberman, J.  Randolph MacPherson, and  Jane B.
   Maxwell  of Sullivan  & Worcester,  Washington,  DC, counsel  for
   Intervenor GraphicData, Inc.
 
        Jerry  A. Walz, Mark  Langstein, Lisa J.  Obayashi, and Fred
   Kopatich, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Finance and
   Litigation,  Department of Commerce,  Washington, DC, counsel for
   Respondent.
 
        Joseph J.  Petrillo, Michael A. Hordell, Laurel A. Heneghan,
   and Jessica C.  Abrahams of Petrillo  & Hordell, Washington,  DC;
   and  Burton Schwalb  of  Schwalb,  Donnenfeld,  Bray  &  Silbert,
   Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor International ComputaPrint
   Corporation.
 
   WILLIAMS, Board Judge.
 
                                 Notice
 
        On  December 1,  1993, the  Board issued  an opinion  in the
   protests   of   Pindar   Donnelley   Partnership   (Pindar)   and
   GraphicData,  Inc. (GDI).    GDI's  protest  was  DISMISSED  WITH
   PREJUDICE.  GDI's request to  intervene as an intervenor of right
   in Pindar's protest was DENIED.  GDI's request  to intervene as a
   permissive intervenor in Pindar's protest was GRANTED.
 
        Because the Board's decision contains information considered
   by the  parties to be  procurement sensitive or  proprietary, the
   Board initially issued its decision  subject in its entirety to a
   protective order.   The parties were advised to  inform the Board
   of any redactions  they consider appropriate by  Friday, December
   3, 1993.  The Board will decide at that time what portions of the
   opinion will be made public.
 
                                      _____________________________
                                      MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS
                                      Board Judge