____________________________________________________________
 
 
                DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 3, 1993
     _____________________________________________________________
        
 
                             GSBCA 12266-P
 
                      FEDERAL SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                  and
 
                     FEDERAL COMPUTER CORPORATION,
 
                                           Intervenor,
 
                                   v.
 
                       DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY,
 
                                           Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                           VION CORPORATION,
 
                                           Intervenor.
 
        Richard  J. Conway,  C. Patteson  Cardwell  IV, Joel  Freid,
   William M. Rosen,  and Hilary S. Cairnie of  Dickstein, Shapiro &
   Morin, Vienna, VA, counsel for Protester.
 
        Edward Gross, Shirley F. Keisler, and Jeffrey S. Romanick of
   Gross  & Wexell,  Fairfax, VA,  and  David S.  Kovach of  Federal
   Computer Corporation,  Falls Church,  VA, counsel for  Intervenor
   Federal Computer Corporation.
 
        Walter  Thomas,  Office  of  the  General  Counsel,  Defense
   Logistics Agency, Alexandria, VA, counsel for Respondent.
 
        David R.  Hazelton, Kathleen  B. Flynn,  Edward J.  Shapiro,
   Irwin  Goldbloom, and  Jonathan S.  Miller of  Latham  & Watkins,
   Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor ViON Corporation.
 
   PARKER, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On  January  19,  1993, Federal  Systems  Group,  Inc. (FSG)
   protested the award of a contract by the Defense Logistics Agency
   (DLA)  to ViON Corporation  (ViON) for automatic  data processing
   equipment  and services.  Federal Computer Corporation intervened
   on the side of the protester; ViON intervened on the side of DLA.
 
        On March 1, the Board received protester's motion to dismiss
   the protest with prejudice, which provided as follows:
 
                  Protester Federal Systems Group, Inc. ("FSG")
             hereby moves  the General  Services Administration
             Board of Contract  Appeals ("Board") for an  Order
             dismissing   the   above-captioned   protest  with
             prejudice  in  accordance   with  Rules  1(e)  and
             28(a)(1) of the Board's Rules of Procedure.
 
        On   March   2,   the  Board   received   Federal   Computer
   Corporation's withdrawal of its intervention, which stated:
 
                  The Intervenor, Federal  Computer Corporation
             (FCC), hereby  withdraws its  intervention in  the
             above-captioned Protest with prejudice.
 
                  WHEREFORE, FCC respectfully requests that the
             Board dismiss this matter with prejudice.
 
        In accordance  with the  parties' requests,  the protest  is
   DISMISSED  WITH  PREJUDICE.    Rule  28(a).    The suspension  of
   respondent's delegation  of procurement  authority lapses  by its
   terms.
 
                                      ____________________________
                                      ROBERT W. PARKER
                                      Board Judge