______________________________________________ DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: January 13, 1993 _______________________________________________ GSBCA 12241-P(12149-P) DISTRIBUTED PLANNING SYSTEMS CORP., Protester, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Respondent, and SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., Intervenor. Richard A. Lebby, Encino, CA, counsel for Protester. Jerome Drummond, General Law Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Kenneth B. Weckstein of Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor. PARKER, Board Judge. ORDER On January 4, 1993, the Board received a motion dated December 31, 1992, filed by Distributed Planning Systems Corp. (DPSC) to reinstate, amend, and supplement its protest which the Board had previously dismissed without prejudice. Distributed Planning Systems Corp. v. Department of the Treasury, GSBCA 12149-P (Dec. 8, 1992). In its motion to reinstate, DPSC alleged that, based on information it received subsequent to the Board's decision, the Department of the Treasury had failed to properly evaluate protester's software proposal. Sheshunoff Information Services, Inc. intervened in this protest on January 7, 1993. On January 12, 1993, the Board received the following notification: DPSC SOFTWARE, INC., a California corporation, and Distributed Planning Systems Corp., a California corporation jointly hereby dismiss, without prejudice, the protest filed on December 31, 1992, and docketed as case no. GSBCA 12241-P(12149-P). Accordingly, this protest is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Rule 28(a). The dismissal shall convert to a dismissal with prejudice on February 26, 1993, unless the protest is refiled prior to that date. ________________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER BOARD JUDGE