DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  December 18, 1992 
                                                             
 
 
                             GSBCA 12194-P 
 
                       ADVANCED MANAGEMENT, INC.,
 
                                                Protester,
 
                                  and
 
                          CBIS FEDERAL, INC.,
 
                                                Intervenor,
 
                                  and
 
                              I-NET, INC.,
                                                Intervenor,
 
                                   v.
 
                         DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
 
                                                Respondent.
 
 
        James K.  Davis of  Advanced Management,  Inc., McLean,  VA,
   counsel for Protester.
 
        Susan  Warshaw Ebner  of CBIS  Federal,  Inc., Fairfax,  VA,
   counsel for Intervenor CBIS Federal, Inc..
 
        James   C.  Hughes,  J.  Andrew  Jackson,  and  C.  Patteson
   Cardwell, IV, of Dickstein, Shapiro & Morin, Vienna VA, and David
   W. Wells,  Vice  President and  General Counsel  of I-Net,  Inc.,
   counsel for Intervenor I-Net, Inc.
 
        Patricia D. Graham, Mary Egger, and Paul W. Lewis, Office of
   Assistant General Counsel for Procurement and Finance, Department
   of Energy, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
   NEILL, Board Judge.
                                 ORDER
 
        This protest was filed with  the Board on November 27, 1992,
   by Advanced Management, Inc. (AMI).  AMI protests its elimination
   from   the  competitive  range  of  a  procurement  for  computer
   facilities management support services for the Energy Information
   Administration of the Department of Energy.  
 
 
        On December  17, 1992,  AMI filed a  motion to  dismiss this
   protest.  Neither respondent nor intervenor have any objection to
   the motion.  
 
        Accordingly,  pursuant  to  Rule  28(a),  this   protest  is
   dismissed without prejudice.  The dismissal shall become one with
   prejudice ten days from the date of  this order unless one of the
   parties prior  to the  expiration of that  period, moves  for the
   reinstatement of this protest.   The Board's order of December 2,
   1992,   suspending   respondent's   delegation   of   procurement
   authority, as applicable to the  procurement which is the subject
   of this protest, lapses by its own terms.  
 
 
                                           ____________________
                                           EDWIN B. NEILL
                                           Board Judge