AMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL: November 17, 1992 GSBCA 12143-P CTA INCORPORATED, Protester, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent, and SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Intervenor. William J. Kolasky, Jr., Peter A. von Mehren, and Rene L. Todd of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Washington, DC, counsel for Protester. Barbara Amster and Mary Brown, Office of Counsel, Naval Command Control and Ocean Surveillance Center, San Diego, CA, and Douglas P. Larsen, Office of Counsel, Naval Supply Systems Command, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Joel R. Feidelman, James J. McCullough, and Deneen J. Melander of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor. DANIELS, Board Judge. ORDER On November 10, 1992, we dismissed this protest without prejudice to its reinstatement no later than 4:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on November 16. This form of dismissal had been sought by the parties; the parties anticipated that by November 16, the intervenor and awardee, Science Applications International Corporation, would have entered into a binding subcontract with the protester, CTA Incorporated, for the performance of a portion of the work covered by the protested contract. At 4 p.m. on November 16, the parties informed the Board that the details of the expected subcontract had not yet been agreed upon. Protester asked, without objection, that the Board amend its order to permit a motion for reinstatement to be filed as late as 4:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on November 18. A written motion to this effect was filed on November 17. We GRANT protester's unopposed motion and AMEND the order of dismissal to provide that the dismissal shall not become with prejudice to reinstatement until 4:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on November 18. Rule 28(a). _________________________ STEPHEN M. DANIELS Board Judge