DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 5, 1992 
                                                             
 
 
                             GSBCA 12126-P 
 
 
                           MICRO-TECH U.S.A.,
 
                                                Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
 
                                                Respondent.
 
 
        Richard E. Shimmel, Chicago, IL, counsel for Protester.
 
        Gregory E. Smith, COL, JA, and George W. Griffith, Office of
   the   Chief   Attorney,    Defense   Supply   Service-Washington,
   Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
   NEILL, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        This protest  was filed by Micro-Tech U.S.A.  on October 15,
   1992.    The  solicitation is  for  the  acquisition  of computer
   hardware and software by the  Department of the Army.  Micro-Tech
   contends  that the cancellation of the solicitation was arbitrary
   and capricious.
 
        On November 3, protester and respondent filed a joint motion
   for  dismissal with  prejudice.   Accordingly,  pursuant to  Rule
   28(a) and the  request of the parties, this  protest is DISMISSED
   WITH PREJUDICE.
 
 
 
                                      _____________________
                                      EDWIN B. NEILL
                                      Board Judge