DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: October 2, 1992 GSBCA 12055-P VALIX FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP, I, Protester, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent. Shelton H. Skolnick, Derwood, MD, counsel for Protester. Craig R. Schmauder and William A. Richards, Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. WILLIAMS, Board Judge. ORDER On September 28, 1992, Valix Federal Partnership I filed a protest with the Board concerning solicitation number DACW49-92-B-0025 issued by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for acquisition of general purpose automatic data processing equipment. On October 1, 1992, the parties filed a joint stipulation and agreement, stating in pertinent part: 1. The Corps and Protestor agree that the protest shall be dismissed without prejudice. The Corps shall consider the agency level protest filed by the Protestor which involves the same subject matter as the instant protest in accordance with the applicable regulations governing agency level protests, and shall consider all allegations contained in the instant protest in its decision on the agency level protest. 2. The Corps and Protestor agree that the Protestor may reinstate the instant protest within ten (10) working days of an adverse agency decision on the agency level protest. The Corps agrees it will not award a contract under the protested solicitation pending final resolution of the protest issues, including resolution by the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals should the protest be properly reinstated. Accordingly, this protest is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Rule 28. This dismissal shall convert to one with prejudice within ten working days of protester's notification of the decision on the agency protest unless reinstated by either party prior to that date. _____________________________ MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS Board Judge