_______________________________________________
 
              DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 28, 1992
            _______________________________________________
 
                             GSBCA 12022-P
 
 
 
                        LOCKHEED SANDERS, INC.,
 
                                                     Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
             NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION,
 
                                                     Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                          SYSCON CORPORATION,
 
                                                     Intervenor.
 
        Thomas  X. Tsirimokos of Lockheed Sanders, Inc., Nashua, NH,
   counsel for Protester Lockheed Sanders, Inc.
    
        Christopher  M. Runkel  and Luis  A.  Vidal, Legal  Services
   Staff  (NXL),  National   Archives  and  Records  Administration,
   Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
        Michael W.  Clancy and  Lee A. Fennell  of Pettit  & Martin,
   Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor.
 
   HYATT, Board Judge.
 
                           ORDER OF DISMISSAL
 
        This protest  challenged a  contract award  by the  National
   Archives  and  Records  Administration  (NARA)  of an  Integrated
   Communications and  Administrative Support  System (ICASS)  to be
   installed  in  a  National  Archives  building  currently   under
   construction in College Park, Maryland.  The contract was awarded
   to SYSCON  Corporation on September  2, 1992.   Lockheed Sanders,
   Inc. (Sanders)  protested the award  in a filing received  by the
   Board on September  18, 1992.  Its protest  was consolidated with
   the  earlier-  filed protest  of  HFS  Inc.,  involving the  same
   procurement, which was docketed as GSBCA 12010-P.  
 
 
        Following  the conduct of discovery, Sanders, on October 27,
   1992, moved the Board to dismiss  its protest with prejudice.  It
   concurrently moved to withdraw  its intervention of right in  the
   HFS Inc. protest.  
 
        Accordingly, this protest is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  Rule
   28(a).
 
                                      ______________________________
                                      CATHERINE B. HYATT
                                      Board Judge