_____________________________________________
 
             DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  August 24, 1992
             _____________________________________________
 
                             GSBCA 11958-P
 
                       MEMOREX TELEX CORPORATION,
 
                                           Protester,
 
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
                                  and
 
                      FEDERAL SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.,
 
                                           Intervenor.
 
 
        William A. Roberts,  III, Lee Curtis, and Anne  H. Warner of
   Howrey &  Simon, Washington,  DC, counsel  for Protester  Memorex
   Telex Corporation.
 
        COL Riggs  L. Wilks,  Jr., MAJ Charles  R. Marvin,  Jr., and
   CAPT  Sophia  Rafatjah,  Office  of  the  Chief  Trial  Attorney,
   Department of the Army, Arlington, VA, counsel for Respondent.
 
        Richard J. Conway,  William F. Savarino, and  Ferhan F. Kipe
   of  Dickstein, Shapiro  &  Morin,  Washington,  DC,  counsel  for
   Intervenor.
 
   Board Judge BORWICK.
 
                           ORDER OF DISMISSAL
 
        On  August 3,  1992, protester,  Memorex Telex  Corporation,
   filed this protest against the  Department of the Army's award of
   a  contract for  direct  access  storage  devices  to  intervenor
   Federal  Systems Group.   Protester alleged that  the contracting
   officer violated statute and regulation in accepting intervenor's
   proposal,  as the  life  cycle  cost  evaluation  was  erroneous.
   Earlier,  Computer Sales International  Incorporated had  filed a
   protest on the same procurement which we docketed as GSBCA 11957-
   P and which was  dismissed on August 17, 1992.   The two protests
   were consolidated.   
 
        We  convened  a  prehearing   conference  and  developed   a
   prehearing schedule.   On August  18, protester  filed a  written
   motion  for withdrawal with prejudice, the parties having settled
   the case.  
 
        Pursuant  to Rule  28(a)(1),  and by  the  agreement of  the
   parties,   this  protest  is  DISMISSED  WITH  PREJUDICE.    Rule
   28(a)(1).    
 
 
 
                                   _________________________
                                   ANTHONY S. BORWICK
                                   Board Judge