!R! CALL BCA; EXIT;
 
 
 
 
                 ______________________________________
 
                        GRANTED:  July 24, 1992
                 ______________________________________
        
 
                             GSBCA 11921-P
 
 
                    INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.,
 
                                             Protester,
                                   v.
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
 
                                             Respondent.
 
        Shelton H. Skolnick, Derwood, MD, counsel for Protester.
 
        Jerry  A.  Walz,  Mark Langstein,  and  Kenneth  A. Lechter,
   Office  of  the   Assistant  General  Counsel  for   Finance  and
   Litigation, Department of  Commerce, Washington, DC,  counsel for
   Respondent.
 
   Before Board Judges BORWICK, HYATT, and WILLIAMS.
 
   HYATT, Board Judge.
 
 
        On July 7, 1992, Integrated Systems Group, Inc. (ISG)  filed
   a protest at the Board challenging the award by the Department of
   Commerce of a contract to Sylvest for the purchase of a  Sun RISC
   Server  and peripherals from  the Sun Microsystems  GSA Schedule.
   By order  dated July 13,  1992, the Board  suspended respondent's
   delegation  of   procurement  authority   with  respect   to  the
   requirements to be purchased pending resolution of the protest.
 
        On July 16, 1992, the parties filed a joint stipulation with
   the Board.   The  stipulation requested that  the Board  enter an
   order adopting the following terms agreed to by the parties:
 
        1.  That the protest be granted.
 
        2.  That the Government immediately re-solicit by means
        of a competitive RFP.
 
        3.  That the prior order of the Board of July 13, 1992,
        suspending the  Government's delegation  of procurement
 
        authority  be withdrawn and that the said delegation be
        re-instated.
 
        4.   That the  Government, upon receipt  of the Board's
        Order in this  case, transmit a copy of  the said Order
        to all interested  parties who had  previously received
        notice of  this  Protest, as  well  as to  the  General
        Services Administration.
 
        5.  That any issue of protest costs, if they are  to be
        pursued by  Protester, shall be  determined pursuant to
        the procedures set forth in Rule 35 of the Rules of the
        General  Services  Administration   Board  of  Contract
        Appeals.
 
 
                                Decision
 
 
        In  accordance  with  the stipulation  of  the  parties, the
   protest  is hereby  GRANTED.    The  suspension  of  respondent's
   procurement authority lapses by its terms.
 
                                      __________________________
                                      CATHERINE B. HYATT
                                      Board Judge
 
 
 
   We concur:
   _________________________________  ___________________________
   ANTHONY S. BORWICK                 MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS
   Board Judge                        Board Judge