ABCDE
 
 
                                                          
 
                DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 17, 1992
                                                          
 
 
                             GSBCA 11905-P
 
 
                  ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
 
                                                Protester,
 
                                  and
 
                        GTE GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS,
 
                                                Intervenor,
 
                                   v.
 
                      DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
 
                                                Respondent,
 
                                  and
 
                       ASPECT TELECOMMUNICATIONS,
 
                                                Intervenor.
 
        Alan R.  Yuspeh of Howrey  & Simon, Washington,  DC, counsel
   for Protester.
 
        Sidney  G. Masri  and Phillip  L.  Radoff of  GTE Government
   Systems, Chantilly,  VA, counsel  for  Intervenor GTE  Government
   Systems.
 
        Harold G.  Mosher, Greg  M.  Weinman, Duane  L. Zezula,  and
   Terrence  P. Dermott, Office  of Chief Counsel,  Internal Revenue
   Service, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
        David   M.  Nadler,  J.  Andrew  Jackson,  and  C.  Patteson
   Cardwell,  IV, of Dickstein, Shapiro & Morin, Vienna, VA, counsel
   for Intervenor Aspect Telecommunications.
 
   NEILL, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        This protest was  filed with the Board on June  29, 1992, by
   Rockwell International Corporation.  Protester maintains that the
   Internal  Revenue Service (IRS) improperly awarded a contract for
   automatic     call    distribution     equipment    to     Aspect
   Telecommunications Corporation (Aspect).   Specifically protester
   alleges  that  Aspect's  proposal  did  not  meet  the  mandatory
   requirements  of the  solicitation,  the  IRS  did  not  evaluate
   offerors in accordance  with the stated evaluation  criteria, and
   the IRS improperly relaxed the minimum mandatory requirements.  
 
        GTE  Government Systems and  Aspect have both  intervened in
   this protest as intervenors of right.  
 
        On Thursday, July 16, counsel  for protester filed a  motion
   to dismiss this  protest with prejudice.  The  motion states that
   all parties to the protest concur in the motion.   
 
        Accordingly,   pursuant  to  Rule  28(a),  this  protest  is
   DISMISSED  WITH  PREJUDICE.    The  Board's  order  of   July  2,
   suspending respondent's  delegation of procurement  authority, as
   applicable to  the  procurement  which is  the  subject  of  this
   protest, lapses by its own terms.  
 
 
                                           ____________________
                                           EDWIN B. NEILL
                                           Board Judge