_______________________________ DISMISSED: October 28, 1993 _______________________________ GSBCA 11857-P-REM WILTEL, INC., Protester, and MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Intervenor, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent, and AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Intervenor. David W. Burgett, Douglas R. Duberstein, William A. Bradford, and Pierre M. Donahue of Hogan & Hartson, Washington, DC, and Patricia E. Martin of Wiltel, Inc., Tulsa, OK, counsel for Protester. Robert Koehler, Mary Beth Bosco, Curtis V. Gomez, and Michael J. Schaengold of Patton, Boggs & Blow, Washington, DC, and Robin L. Redfield of MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor MCI Telecommunications Corporation. George Barclay, Michael J. Ettner, and Seth Binstock, Personal Property Division, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Thomas C. Papson and Daniel E. Johnson of McKenna & Cuneo, Washington, DC, and Jonathan S. Hoak, G. Ridgely Loux, and Michael R. Greene of AT&T Communications, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, counsel for Intervenor AT&T Communications, Inc. Before Board Judges HENDLEY, NEILL, and PARKER. HENDLEY, Board Judge. ORDER In accordance with the judgement of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, reversing our decision in Wiltel, Inc. v. General Services Admin., GSBCA 11857-P, 93-1 BCA 25,314, 1992 BPD 201 (issued as a mandate on October 20, 1993), the captioned protest is hereby DISMISSED. _____________________________ JAMES W. HENDLEY Board Judge We concur: _________________________ _____________________________ EDWIN B. NEILL ROBERT W. PARKER Board Judge Board Judge