_____________________________________________________ DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: October 26, 1995 _____________________________________________________ GSBCA 13403 BUCKNER AND MOORE, INC., Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Earl Hall, Vice President of Buckner and Moore, Inc., Moore, OK, appearing for Appellant. Kevin M. Myles, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Fort Worth, TX, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges PARKER, NEILL, and DeGRAFF. DeGRAFF, Board Judge. Buckner and Moore, Inc. (Buckner) entered into a construction contract with the General Services Administration (GSA). When a dispute developed between the parties, Buckner filed this appeal. Because Buckner never submitted a claim to the contracting officer, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Findings of Fact Buckner filed this appeal on September 1, 1995, asking that we direct the contracting officer to issue a decision. Because it was not clear that Buckner had submitted a claim to the contracting officer, we asked Buckner to send us a copy of its claim letter. Buckner sent us copies of two letters that are addressed to Buckner from one of its subcontractors. On September 8, 1995, we issued an order directing the parties to send us evidence by September 29, 1995, establishing whether a claim was submitted to the contracting officer. Our order explains that, if no claim was submitted, we will have to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction. On September 29, 1995, GSA responded to our September 8, 1995 order. GSA says that Buckner never submitted a claim. In support of its position, GSA submitted a statement signed by the contracting officer and a copy of the contract's Disputes clause. Because Buckner never responded to our September 8, 1995 order, we issued an order on October 2, 1995, directing Buckner to show cause by October 10, 1995, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Again, we explained the jurisdictional prerequisites for pursuing an appeal. Buckner never responded to our October 2, 1995 order. Discussion Our authorizing legislation requires that all claims by a contractor must be submitted to the contracting officer in writing. If a claim is not submitted to the contracting officer for a decision, we cannot consider an appeal concerning that claim. 41 U.S.C. 605 (1988). Because Buckner did not submit a claim to the contracting officer before filing this appeal, we lack jurisdiction to consider this case. Decision This appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. _____________________________ MARTHA H. DeGRAFF Board Judge We concur: _______________________________ _______________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER EDWIN B. NEILL Board Judge Board Judge