____________________________________________
 
               DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 8, 1995
              ____________________________________________
 
 
                              GSBCA 13227
 
 
                       LYN CONTRACTING CO., INC.,
 
                                                Appellant,
 
                                   v.
 
                    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
                                                Respondent.
 
        John G.  Earle of  Breslin,  Sweeney &  Earle, Warwick,  RI,
   counsel for Appellant.
 
        David  G. Gherlein,  Office  of  Regional  Counsel,  General
   Services Administration, Boston, MA, counsel for Respondent.
 
   WILLIAMS, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On March  28, 1995, Lyn Contracting (Lyn) appealed the final
   decision of a General Services Administration contracting officer
   denying Lyn's claim under  contract number GS-01P-94-NLC-0020 for
   painting of  the common  space in the  Federal Building  and U.S.
   Courthouse in Springfield,  Massachusetts.  On November  6, 1995,
   the parties filed a joint motion for dismissal of the appeal with
   prejudice, stating in pertinent part:
 
        1.   A  bilateral  modification has  been  entered into
             between the  appellant, Lyn Contracting  Co., Inc.
             and respondent,  General Services  Administration,
             which settles all disputes under GSBCA No. 13227.
 
        2.   The General Services  Administration has agreed to
             pay the appellant $7,500 plus interest relating to
             contract GS-01P-94-NLC-0020. . . .
 
        3.   The parties  to this appeal  request and stipulate
             that the Board dismiss the above-captioned  appeal
 
             with  prejudice, as  all disputes  thereunder have
             been settled.
 
        4.   The  parties  hereto additionally  stipulate  that
             upon  issuance of  said  Order  of Dismissal  with
             Prejudice,   neither   party    shall   move   for
             reconsideration,  nor  appeal   to  any  appellate
             court, nor  otherwise challenge  the order in  any
             way.
 
        Accordingly,  this  appeal  is   DISMISSED  WITH  PREJUDICE.
   Rule 28(a).
 
 
 
                                      ______________________________
                                      MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS
                                      Board Judge