_____________________________ GRANTED IN PART: May 15, 1995 _____________________________ GSBCA 12854 URBAN CLEANING CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Sam Zalman Gdanski, Montebello (Suffern), NY, counsel for Appellant. Richard R. Butterworth, Jr., General Services Administration, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges HYATT, VERGILIO, and GOODMAN. VERGILIO, Board Judge. On June 1, 1994, the Board received this appeal of Urban Cleaning Contractors, Inc., challenging deductions taken by the respondent, the General Services Administration, under a janitorial and related services contract. The contracting officer had denied a claim by Urban to recover $125,780.33. On May 11, 1995, the parties submitted a joint settlement agreement which stipulates, in part, that the agency agrees to pay Urban $21,000 (inclusive of interest, attorney fees, and all other costs) and that the parties agree to submit the case to the Board for decision in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement. Each party has submitted a certificate of finality indicating that it will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board's decision, and that it will not appeal the decision. The Board adopts the stipulation. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 36(e), the Board GRANTS IN PART this appeal. Urban is entitled to recover $21,000 to be paid pursuant to statute. 41 U.S.C. 612 (1988). Given the terms of the stipulation, Urban is not entitled to any separately calculated interest pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978. 41 U.S.C. 611 (1988). _________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge We concur: ____________________________ ___________________________ CATHERINE B. HYATT ALLAN H. GOODMAN Board Judge Board Judge