DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 14, 1993
                                                         
 
 
                              GSBCA 12473
 
 
                       MEMORY PRODUCTS AND MORE,
 
                                                Appellant,
 
                                   v.
 
                    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
                                                Respondent.
 
        Thomas L. McGovern  III of Hogan &  Hartson, Washington, DC,
   counsel for Appellant.
 
        John  C.  Sawyer,  Personal  Property  Division,  Office  of
   General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC,
   counsel for Respondent.
 
   DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
 
        On  June  28, 1993,  Memory  Products  and More  appealed  a
   contracting officer's decision terminating for default a contract
   with  the General  Services  Administration  for  the  supply  of
   computer memory boards.  
 
        On October 14, subsequent to an agreement settling the case,
   appellant  moved for  a  dismissal with  prejudice.   The parties
   state  that  the contract  had  been  terminated  because of  the
   contracting officer's  belief that  appellant had  misrepresented
   its "Authorized Schedule Pricelist."  According to the settlement
   agreement, GSA acknowledges that such a misrepresentation did not
   occur,  and  is  to  convert  the  termination  to  one  for  the
   convenience  of the  Government;  appellant  will  not  submit  a
   termination settlement claim.
 
        In   accordance  with  the  parties'  wishes,  the  case  is
   DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
 
 
                                      _________________________
                                      STEPHEN M. DANIELS
                                      Board Judge