DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: June 9, 1994
                                                        
 
 
                              GSBCA 12347
 
 
                     SEAGRAVE COATINGS CORPORATION,
 
                                           Appellant,
 
                                   v.
 
                    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
        Marla J. Moss of Tepperman  & Moss, West Orange, NJ, counsel
   for Appellant.
 
        David  Frecker  and Wendy  Nevett  Bazil, Personal  Property
   Division,   Office   of   General   Counsel,   General   Services
   Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
   DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman). 
 
                                 ORDER
 
        On  March 29, 1993, Seagrave Coatings Corporation appealed a
   contracting officer's decision terminating for default a contract
   to  supply aluminum paint to the General Services Administration,
   and  assessing  excess  reprocurement  costs  in  the  amount  of
   $160,857.56.
 
        On  February 28, 1994 --  shortly before a scheduled hearing
   in  the  case --  the parties  informed the  Board that  they had
   agreed to a settlement in principle.
 
        On June  9, appellant informed  the Board that  although the
   settlement has not yet been  completed, appellant does not object
   to a  dismissal of the case  without prejudice to remove  it from
   the Board's docket.
 
        The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.  In accordance with
   Rule 28(b), this  dismissal shall become  one with prejudice  180
   calendar days after  the date of this order,  unless either party
   earlier moves for reinstatement.
 
                                      _________________________
                                      STEPHEN M. DANIELS
                                      Board Judge