_______________________________________________ DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: November 4, 1993 _______________________________________________ GSBCA 12165-SBA BRAVO MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellant, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Dennis J. Riley and Andrew B. Katz of Elliott, Bray & Riley, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. Audrey H. Liebross, Attorney Advisor, Small Business Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. BORWICK, Board Judge. ORDER On November 3, 1993, we held a telephone conference with counsel for the parties participating. This appeal was filed at this Board due to confusion about which board (the Armed Services Board or the General Services Administration Board) has jurisdiction of a dispute involving a small and disadvantaged business subcontractor. The Army Missile Materiel Readiness Command is the procuring agency; the Small Business Administration (SBA) is the prime contractor and appellant is the subcontractor to SBA. Appellant has also filed an appeal on the same dispute with the Armed Services Board. The SBA, as the prime contractor, has refused to participate in the proceedings before the Armed Services Board while a parallel appeal is pending here. SBA counsel has promised to move to participate in the Armed Services Board proceeding as soon as a dismissal order is entered by this Board. Based on that promise, both parties agree that the appeal at this Board should be dismissed. Pursuant to Rule 28(a)(1), this appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. _________________________ ANTHONY S. BORWICK Board Judge