_________________________________________ DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 29, 1993 _________________________________________ GSBCA 12017 RASHMI M. AMIN, Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Rashmi M. Amin, pro se, Springfield, VA, appearing for Appellant. Judith A. Bonner, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges HENDLEY, NEILL, and DeGRAFF. DeGRAFF, Board Judge. ORDER On May 15, 1992, Mr. Amin purchased an automobile from the General Services Administration (GSA) and, according to Mr. Amin, the automobile's transmission was defective. In this appeal, filed September 16, 1992, Mr. Amin requests review of a contracting officer's decision to deny Mr. Amin's request for a refund of the purchase price of the automobile. On September 22, 1992, the Board sent an order to the parties that required Mr. Amin either to file a complaint or to designate his notice of appeal as the complaint, to elect the small claims or accelerated procedure, and to waive or request a hearing, all by October 21, 1992. On November 23, 1992, having heard nothing from Mr. Amin, the Board telephoned him to ask whether he had received the Board's September 22, 1992 order. Mr. Amin stated that he had received the order and that he anticipated filing something with the Board. On February 2, 1993, having heard nothing from Mr. Amin, the Board issued an order which required Mr. Amin to file his complaint or designate his notice of appeal as his complaint by February 19, 1993. The order also required Mr. Amin to file a status report by February 26, 1993, proposing dates for further proceedings. On March 1, 1993, having heard nothing from Mr. Amin, the Board issued an order which related the history of Mr. Amin's failure to comply with the Board's orders. The order required Mr. Amin to file his complaint or designate his notice of appeal as his complaint by March 15, 1993. The order states, "If Mr. Amin fails to take either of these actions by March 15, 1993, the Board will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute." This order was sent by certified mail and was delivered on March 4, 1993. To date, the Board has heard nothing from Mr. Amin. Board Rule 28(b) provides that the Board may, upon its own initiative, dismiss an appeal for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with any order of the Board. Mr. Amin has taken no action to advance this case since filing his notice of appeal approximately six months ago. He has failed to respond to any of the Board's orders that, in essence, invited him to prosecute this appeal. Decision The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for appellant's failure to prosecute. Rule 28(b)(1). ___________________________ MARTHA H. DeGRAFF Board Judge We concur: ___________________________ ___________________________ JAMES W. HENDLEY EDWIN B. NEILL Board Judge Board Judge