DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE : March 16, 1993 GSBCA 11792 EAGLE LOCK CORPORATION, Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Victor Bilaisis, President of Eagle Lock Corporation, Downers Grove, IL, appearing for Appellant. Michael D. Tully, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges PARKER, NEILL, and HYATT. PARKER, Board Judge. On January 6, 1992, the contracting officer for the General Services Administration, respondent, issued a final decision assessing $320,657.77 in excess reprocurement costs against Eagle Lock Corporation, appellant. Appeal File, Exhibit 107. Respondent mailed the letter to appellant, which then timely filed its notice of appeal on April 7, 1992. Id., Exhibit 108. Appellant filed its complaint on May 12, 1992, and asked to proceed on the written record on August 20, 1992. Rule 11. Soon thereafter, the corporation and its president, Victor Bilaisis, filed a voluntary petition pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 301 (1988) for relief under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy code, 11 U.S.C. 1101-1174. The petition was filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Discussion Respondent has asked the Board to dismiss appellant's case, citing 11 U.S.C. 362(a)(1) (1988), which stays all claims against a bankruptcy estate while the bankruptcy court, trustee, or receiver reorganizes the affairs of the estate. Even prosecution of a Government claim is stayed, Kroy Inc., GSBCA 10619, 90-3 BCA 23,182, unless the Government is exercising a police or regulatory power. See 11 U.S.C. 362(b)(4), (5) (1988); United States v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 804 F.2d 348, 350 (6th Cir. 1986). Here, the regulatory power exception to the stay does not apply, since respondent is acting as a commercial purchaser, not as a regulator; the "claim" that appellant presents is a request that we determine the propriety of a debt assessment against the bankrupt. The automatic stay bars us from further action concerning the assessment against appellant. Van Ness Associates, Ltd., A California Ltd. Partnership v. General Services Administration, GSBCA 11862, slip op. at 3 (Sept. 16, 1992) (Board consideration of Government claim may result in a judgment against appellant). Decision For the reasons stated above, the appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Rule 28(b). We are dismissing the appeal merely as a docket control device, but consider this action as equivalent to a stay of proceedings. Appellant may reinstate the appeal within thirty days after the bankruptcy proceedings are concluded, or at any time in the event the Bankruptcy Court elects to defer to this Board the adjudication of respondent's claim against appellant. See Gary Aircraft Corp. v. United States (In Re Gary Aircraft Corp.), 698 F.2d 775 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820. If the appeal is not reinstated within the prescribed time period, the dismissal shall convert to a dismissal with prejudice. _________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER Board Judge We concur: _________________________ _________________________ EDWIN B. NEILL CATHERINE B. HYATT Board Judge Board Judge