________________________________________________ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED: March 1, 1994 ________________________________________________ GSBCA 10506-R, 10935-R AIR INC., Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. D.A. Dean, President of Air Inc., San Carlos, CA, appearing for Appellant. John E. Cornell, Office of General Counsel, Personal Property Division, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges LaBELLA, HENDLEY, and VERGILIO. VERGILIO, Board Judge. By opinion dated August 17, 1993, this Board denied the underlying appeals of Air Inc. Air Inc. v. General Services Administration, GSBCA 10506, et al., 94-1 BCA 26,325. On September 27, 1993, the contractor requested reconsideration pursuant to Rule 32 "due to errors and omissions in evaluation of the evidence, and misleading evidence submitted by the Government." The contractor takes issue with specific findings of fact (paragraphs 2, 3, 6, 9, 20) and portions of the discussion of the concurring/dissenting opinion. In response to the motion, the agency contends that reconsideration should be denied, the contractor having failed to allege any appropriate basis for reconsideration. In attempting to relitigate its cases, the contractor takes issue with findings of fact and legal conclusions. Although the contractor's view of the underlying facts and applicable law may well differ from the Board's, the contractor has raised no basis meriting reconsideration. The contractor already has had the opportunity to develop the factual and legal record in support of its case. The Board DENIES the motion for reconsideration. ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge We concur: _____________________________ _____________________________ VINCENT A. LaBELLA JAMES W. HENDLEY Board Judge Board Judge